Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
In cases where an assessee has wrongfully availed self-credit, the inadmissible credit needs to be recovered if not reversed by the assessee within the specified period, following the procedure laid down under Notification No. 19/2008. The authorities must issue a notice and follow the prescribed manner for recovery u/s 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Rejecting the refund without adhering to the statutory procedure is legally incorrect. The order becomes superfluous if the alleged wrongful credit has not been established through the proper manner. The appellants are entitled to a refund calculated as per Notification No. 19/2008, since the rejection of the cash refund was not legally valid.
In cases where an assessee has wrongfully availed self-credit, the inadmissible credit needs to be recovered if not reversed by the assessee within the specified period, following the procedure laid down under Notification No. 19/2008. The authorities must issue a notice and follow the prescribed manner for recovery u/s 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Rejecting the refund without adhering to the statutory procedure is legally incorrect. The order becomes superfluous if the alleged wrongful credit has not been established through the proper manner. The appellants are entitled to a refund calculated as per Notification No. 19/2008, since the rejection of the cash refund was not legally valid.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
