Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
International cargo transhipment through Indian ports continues with Customs-controlled storage, re-export safeguards, and coordinated multi-station m...
The case pertains to the estimation of income and disallowance of bogus purchases. The purchases were deemed sham transactions fabricated through bogus paper concerns engaged in providing accommodation entries. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) partly allowed the Revenue's appeal, holding that for bogus purchases, the addition at the rate of 6% of the bogus purchases was fair and reasonable. The High Court upheld the ITAT's view, stating that the conclusion was based on the material and analysis of facts and figures available. The court found no substantial questions of law arising from the ITAT's decision to reduce the disallowance from 12.5% to 6% for the bogus purchases.
The case pertains to the estimation of income and disallowance of bogus purchases. The purchases were deemed sham transactions fabricated through bogus paper concerns engaged in providing accommodation entries. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) partly allowed the Revenue's appeal, holding that for bogus purchases, the addition at the rate of 6% of the bogus purchases was fair and reasonable. The High Court upheld the ITAT's view, stating that the conclusion was based on the material and analysis of facts and figures available. The court found no substantial questions of law arising from the ITAT's decision to reduce the disallowance from 12.5% to 6% for the bogus purchases.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
