Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Page of 4824
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
601 to 620 of 96463 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Circular No. 36/2010-Customs dated 23.09.2010 issued under the Customs Act, 1962, specifically para 3(a), was struck down as ultra vires Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India and Section 149 of the Customs Act by the Gujarat High Court in Messrs Mahalaxmi Rubtech Ltd. v. Union of India. The petitioner's application for conversion of shipping bills to drawback shipping bills from 01.10.2017 to 31.03.2020 was rejected based on the time limit prescribed in the struck-down para 3(a). The High Court quashed the impugned order dated 19.04.2023 and remanded the matter, directing the respondent to pass an appropriate order to convert the petitioner's shipping bills from 01.10.2017 to 13.03.2020 to drawback shipping bills u/s 149 of the Customs Act, enabling the petitioner to become eligible for duty drawback as per Circular No. 88 of 2017.
Circular No. 36/2010-Customs dated 23.09.2010 issued under the Customs Act, 1962, specifically para 3(a), was struck down as ultra vires Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India and Section 149 of the Customs Act by the Gujarat High Court in Messrs Mahalaxmi Rubtech Ltd. v. Union of India. The petitioner's application for conversion of shipping bills to drawback shipping bills from 01.10.2017 to 31.03.2020 was rejected based on the time limit prescribed in the struck-down para 3(a). The High Court quashed the impugned order dated 19.04.2023 and remanded the matter, directing the respondent to pass an appropriate order to convert the petitioner's shipping bills from 01.10.2017 to 13.03.2020 to drawback shipping bills u/s 149 of the Customs Act, enabling the petitioner to become eligible for duty drawback as per Circular No. 88 of 2017.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.