Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
The appellants contended that the insolvency resolution process was not conducted as per the Code and due process was not followed, with bank account details being shared at a belated stage. However, the NCLT held that the appellants failed to comply with the repayment plan conditions and deposit the required amount, constituting a breach under Regulation 20 of the IBBI (Insolvency Resolution Process for Personal Guarantors) Regulations, 2019. The RP was within his rights to submit a report u/s 118(2) of the Code. Initial installment payments cannot excuse subsequent defaults in the repayment schedule. The NCLAT found no apparent factual or legal flaws in the impugned orders declining to recall the orders declaring premature end of the repayment plan and granting liberty to proceed u/s 121 of the Code. The appeal was disposed of.
The appellants contended that the insolvency resolution process was not conducted as per the Code and due process was not followed, with bank account details being shared at a belated stage. However, the NCLT held that the appellants failed to comply with the repayment plan conditions and deposit the required amount, constituting a breach under Regulation 20 of the IBBI (Insolvency Resolution Process for Personal Guarantors) Regulations, 2019. The RP was within his rights to submit a report u/s 118(2) of the Code. Initial installment payments cannot excuse subsequent defaults in the repayment schedule. The NCLAT found no apparent factual or legal flaws in the impugned orders declining to recall the orders declaring premature end of the repayment plan and granting liberty to proceed u/s 121 of the Code. The appeal was disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
