Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
The appellant availed CENVAT credit on intellectual property service received from the Input Service Distributor (ISD), TSL Kolkata. The Revenue denied the credit to the appellant despite not disputing its availment by TSL Kolkata. CESTAT held that since TSL Kolkata's credit availment was undisputed, the appellant was entitled to take the distributed credit based on invoices issued by ISD. Reversal of credit by appellant was not required. The impugned order denying credit was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.
The appellant availed CENVAT credit on intellectual property service received from the Input Service Distributor (ISD), TSL Kolkata. The Revenue denied the credit to the appellant despite not disputing its availment by TSL Kolkata. CESTAT held that since TSL Kolkata's credit availment was undisputed, the appellant was entitled to take the distributed credit based on invoices issued by ISD. Reversal of credit by appellant was not required. The impugned order denying credit was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
