Intermediary service classification fails where overseas admission facilitation is supplied independently, preserving export treatment and small-provi...
Satellite transponder bandwidth is telecommunication, not Business Support Service; foreign non-telegraph providers triggered no service tax liability...
Commitment proceedings gain extended timelines, structured defect refiling, and automatic resumption of inquiry after the adjusted completion period e...
Centralised assessment transfer becomes unwarranted once the searched person's assessment is complete, requiring restoration to the appropriate charge...
The appellant availed CENVAT credit on intellectual property service received from the Input Service Distributor (ISD), TSL Kolkata. The Revenue denied the credit to the appellant despite not disputing its availment by TSL Kolkata. CESTAT held that since TSL Kolkata's credit availment was undisputed, the appellant was entitled to take the distributed credit based on invoices issued by ISD. Reversal of credit by appellant was not required. The impugned order denying credit was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.
The appellant availed CENVAT credit on intellectual property service received from the Input Service Distributor (ISD), TSL Kolkata. The Revenue denied the credit to the appellant despite not disputing its availment by TSL Kolkata. CESTAT held that since TSL Kolkata's credit availment was undisputed, the appellant was entitled to take the distributed credit based on invoices issued by ISD. Reversal of credit by appellant was not required. The impugned order denying credit was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
