Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Section 264 empowers Commissioner to revise assessment order to provide relief to assessee in cases of over-assessment, even if assessee did not file revised return. Commissioner erred in rejecting revision application merely on ground that assessee did not file revised return. Section 264 is a salutary provision to remedy bona fide mistakes and correct inadvertent situations in assessment proceedings to prevent injustice. Goetze and M.S. Raju decisions not applicable in present case. Commissioner directed to pass appropriate order u/s 264 on merits of adjustment claimed by assessee.
Section 264 empowers Commissioner to revise assessment order to provide relief to assessee in cases of over-assessment, even if assessee did not file revised return. Commissioner erred in rejecting revision application merely on ground that assessee did not file revised return. Section 264 is a salutary provision to remedy bona fide mistakes and correct inadvertent situations in assessment proceedings to prevent injustice. Goetze and M.S. Raju decisions not applicable in present case. Commissioner directed to pass appropriate order u/s 264 on merits of adjustment claimed by assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
