Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Section 264 empowers Commissioner to revise assessment order to provide relief to assessee in cases of over-assessment, even if assessee did not file revised return. Commissioner erred in rejecting revision application merely on ground that assessee did not file revised return. Section 264 is a salutary provision to remedy bona fide mistakes and correct inadvertent situations in assessment proceedings to prevent injustice. Goetze and M.S. Raju decisions not applicable in present case. Commissioner directed to pass appropriate order u/s 264 on merits of adjustment claimed by assessee.
Section 264 empowers Commissioner to revise assessment order to provide relief to assessee in cases of over-assessment, even if assessee did not file revised return. Commissioner erred in rejecting revision application merely on ground that assessee did not file revised return. Section 264 is a salutary provision to remedy bona fide mistakes and correct inadvertent situations in assessment proceedings to prevent injustice. Goetze and M.S. Raju decisions not applicable in present case. Commissioner directed to pass appropriate order u/s 264 on merits of adjustment claimed by assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
