Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalty u/s 271AAB(1A)(b) was levied for suo moto disallowance of personal expenses u/s 37 by the assessee in the return filed in response to a notice u/s 153A. The assessee had made the disallowance in the search assessment completed u/s 153A, where no concealment was found. The issue of levying penalty u/s 271AAB in such circumstances is no longer res integra, following the Delhi High Court's decision in Neeraj Jindal. Accordingly, the penalty u/s 271AAB is deleted.
Penalty u/s 271AAB(1A)(b) was levied for suo moto disallowance of personal expenses u/s 37 by the assessee in the return filed in response to a notice u/s 153A. The assessee had made the disallowance in the search assessment completed u/s 153A, where no concealment was found. The issue of levying penalty u/s 271AAB in such circumstances is no longer res integra, following the Delhi High Court's decision in Neeraj Jindal. Accordingly, the penalty u/s 271AAB is deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.