Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    Inadmissible statements and electronic evidence cannot sustain undervaluation where contemporaneous import data is wrongly discarded.
    Tariff classification of generators used with turboprop engines was held to fall under heading 8501, not heading 8511.
    Bluetooth headset classification under CTI 8518 30 00 upheld; extended limitation and penalty under section 114A set aside.
    Natural justice and transaction value govern ad valorem export duty; moisture variation alone cannot displace declared sale price.
    Provisional release conditions for seized imported goods cannot exceed what is needed to secure duty and interest.
    Rule 2(a) does not treat unassembled elevator parts as complete lifts when essential components are missing.
    Sanctioned scheme of arrangement binds creditors and bars separate suits over claims assigned under the settlement framework.
    Condonation of delay in a first appeal on facts and law granted where the appellate remedy was treated as a valuable right.
    Personal guarantor liability survives resolution plan approval and limitation objection fails in Section 95 insolvency proceedings.
    Third-party mortgage does not create financial debt without disbursement; claim can still be admitted as an other creditor.
    Preferential transaction analysis under insolvency law upheld only for the related-party creditor transfer; CoC approval was not required.
    Pre-existing dispute under insolvency law failed where the debtor had already crystallised and acknowledged the balance payable.
    Statutory first charge and deemed relinquishment shaped treatment of VAT and CST dues in liquidation.
    Simultaneous insolvency and post-liquidation settlement limits upheld, with liquidation sustained despite objections and absent resolution plans.
    Section 19 assistance under insolvency law cannot compel a former statutory auditor absent possession or proven necessity.
    Liquidation waterfall under insolvency law prevails over state tax claims, barring treatment of tax dues as secured debt.
    Inter-divisional services within the same organisation were held outside service tax, with revenue neutrality defeating the demand.
    Inter-State sales proof and assessment jurisdiction upheld; limitation, cross-examination, and penalty objections were rejected.
    Approved resolution plan extinguishes pre-CIRP income-tax dues, making later reassessment and demand notice unsustainable.
    Retraction-based commission additions and time-barred reassessment fail without corroboration, threshold compliance or verified electronic evidence.
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

whatsapp Join Channel
Showing Results for : Reset Filters

Validity of reopening an assessment beyond four years from the...

Tribunal Quashes Tax Reassessment; Allows Rs. 90 Crore Deduction, Rejects Multiple House Ownership Claim.

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Income Tax October 1, 2024 Case Laws AT
Validity of reopening an assessment beyond four years from the end of the relevant assessment year, denial of deduction u/s 54F, and the addition on the ground of owning more than one residential house. The key points are: the assessee did not fail to furnish requisite details, satisfying the proviso to Section 147; the Assessing Officer could not have validly assumed jurisdiction u/s 147 based on website information; different floors of a property cannot be construed as independent residential units, as decided by the Tribunal in the assessee's own wealth tax case; merely having several independent residential units does not impact the claim for deduction u/s 54F. The reassessment proceedings were quashed, and the assessee was entitled to a deduction of Rs. 90 crores u/s 54F. The denial of deduction u/s 54F for not utilizing the entire sale proceeds was addressed, clarifying that no deduction u/s 80G was claimed for the donation to the trust. The loan from Alert Buildtech was accepted as genuine, and no addition was made u/s 68.

Topics

Acts Income Tax