Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
501 to 520 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Section 154 rectification order reversing previous order on allowance of depreciation on non-compete fee cannot be invoked when the issue is debatable. Primary issue pending consideration before Supreme Court. Jurisdictional High Court admitted whether Section 154 powers can be exercised when the issue is debatable in assessee's own case for earlier assessment year. Considering High Court admission of identical question in assessee's case, for judicial discipline and propriety, impugned order set aside, issue restored to CIT(Appeals) to decide after outcome of assessee's own case for AY 2012-13 and pass order accordingly. Appeal allowed for statistical purposes.
Section 154 rectification order reversing previous order on allowance of depreciation on non-compete fee cannot be invoked when the issue is debatable. Primary issue pending consideration before Supreme Court. Jurisdictional High Court admitted whether Section 154 powers can be exercised when the issue is debatable in assessee's own case for earlier assessment year. Considering High Court admission of identical question in assessee's case, for judicial discipline and propriety, impugned order set aside, issue restored to CIT(Appeals) to decide after outcome of assessee's own case for AY 2012-13 and pass order accordingly. Appeal allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.