Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Customs Act, 1962 - Penalty levied on appellant as co-noticee for principal violator's diversion of duty-free imported goods under DEEC scheme to local market without fulfilling export obligation. Appellant's relationship with principal violator not sufficient evidence of knowledge about modus operandi. Appellant severed ties with partnership firm after payment issue. Commissioner's order imposing penalty set aside by Appellate Tribunal due to lack of corroborative evidence against appellant.
Customs Act, 1962 - Penalty levied on appellant as co-noticee for principal violator's diversion of duty-free imported goods under DEEC scheme to local market without fulfilling export obligation. Appellant's relationship with principal violator not sufficient evidence of knowledge about modus operandi. Appellant severed ties with partnership firm after payment issue. Commissioner's order imposing penalty set aside by Appellate Tribunal due to lack of corroborative evidence against appellant.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4807
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
