Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Reasonable time limit for issuing notice u/s 201(1)/201(1A) is 4 years, as held in GE India Technology Centre and Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. judgments. Where notice is issued beyond 4 years, it is barred by limitation u/s 201(1). In the present case, orders are beyond 4 years from the end of the financial year, hence unsustainable and quashed. The entire proceeding arose from a belated and unsustainable survey u/s 133A(2A) conducted on 09/12/2019, which is quashed. Non-resident income is clearly time-barred, while resident income transaction did not crystallize. Assessee's appeal allowed.
Reasonable time limit for issuing notice u/s 201(1)/201(1A) is 4 years, as held in GE India Technology Centre and Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. judgments. Where notice is issued beyond 4 years, it is barred by limitation u/s 201(1). In the present case, orders are beyond 4 years from the end of the financial year, hence unsustainable and quashed. The entire proceeding arose from a belated and unsustainable survey u/s 133A(2A) conducted on 09/12/2019, which is quashed. Non-resident income is clearly time-barred, while resident income transaction did not crystallize. Assessee's appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
