Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Reasonable time limit for issuing notice u/s 201(1)/201(1A) is 4 years, as held in GE India Technology Centre and Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. judgments. Where notice is issued beyond 4 years, it is barred by limitation u/s 201(1). In the present case, orders are beyond 4 years from the end of the financial year, hence unsustainable and quashed. The entire proceeding arose from a belated and unsustainable survey u/s 133A(2A) conducted on 09/12/2019, which is quashed. Non-resident income is clearly time-barred, while resident income transaction did not crystallize. Assessee's appeal allowed.
Reasonable time limit for issuing notice u/s 201(1)/201(1A) is 4 years, as held in GE India Technology Centre and Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. judgments. Where notice is issued beyond 4 years, it is barred by limitation u/s 201(1). In the present case, orders are beyond 4 years from the end of the financial year, hence unsustainable and quashed. The entire proceeding arose from a belated and unsustainable survey u/s 133A(2A) conducted on 09/12/2019, which is quashed. Non-resident income is clearly time-barred, while resident income transaction did not crystallize. Assessee's appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
