Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
The NCLAT upheld the admission of the Section 7 application filed by the Financial Creditor (Respondent No.1) for initiating CIRP against the Corporate Debtor. It held that the Financial Creditor had a financial debt which had become due and payable, and there was an incidence of default. The application was filed within the time limitation as the Corporate Debtor had acknowledged the outstanding debt. The Corporate Debtor was given an opportunity to regularize its loan account but failed to pay the required amount. The declaration of the account as NPA under SARFAESI Act did not obstruct the Financial Creditor from initiating CIRP. The loan disbursement by the Financial Creditor was interest-bearing, satisfying the definition of financial debt u/s 5(8) of the IBC. The acknowledgment of debt and default was clear and unambiguous. As a debt was due and payable by the Corporate Debtor, and a default had occurred, the Financial Creditor was entitled to file the Section 7 application, which was rightly admitted by the Adjudicating Authority.
The NCLAT upheld the admission of the Section 7 application filed by the Financial Creditor (Respondent No.1) for initiating CIRP against the Corporate Debtor. It held that the Financial Creditor had a financial debt which had become due and payable, and there was an incidence of default. The application was filed within the time limitation as the Corporate Debtor had acknowledged the outstanding debt. The Corporate Debtor was given an opportunity to regularize its loan account but failed to pay the required amount. The declaration of the account as NPA under SARFAESI Act did not obstruct the Financial Creditor from initiating CIRP. The loan disbursement by the Financial Creditor was interest-bearing, satisfying the definition of financial debt u/s 5(8) of the IBC. The acknowledgment of debt and default was clear and unambiguous. As a debt was due and payable by the Corporate Debtor, and a default had occurred, the Financial Creditor was entitled to file the Section 7 application, which was rightly admitted by the Adjudicating Authority.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
