Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Proceeds of crime and legality of petitioner's arrest under PMLA for alleged illegal mining were examined. Grounds of arrest and reasons to believe were based solely on purported illegal mining by fabricating e-rawana bills. In first eight FIRs, petitioner was not an accused. In ninth FIR too, petitioner was not named, but ED tried implicating him as Director of DSPL, which records showed he ceased being from 07.11.2013. ED failed to substantiate petitioner's involvement as Director, Promoter or shareholder of the alleged GM Co. No material showed petitioner directly or indirectly indulged in any process connected with proceeds of crime or projected untainted proceeds. No grounds for arrest under PMLA were made out against petitioner for money laundering offence. Petitioner not being involved in any illegal activity attracting PMLA offence, petition was allowed for his release if not required in any other case.
Proceeds of crime and legality of petitioner's arrest under PMLA for alleged illegal mining were examined. Grounds of arrest and reasons to believe were based solely on purported illegal mining by fabricating e-rawana bills. In first eight FIRs, petitioner was not an accused. In ninth FIR too, petitioner was not named, but ED tried implicating him as Director of DSPL, which records showed he ceased being from 07.11.2013. ED failed to substantiate petitioner's involvement as Director, Promoter or shareholder of the alleged GM Co. No material showed petitioner directly or indirectly indulged in any process connected with proceeds of crime or projected untainted proceeds. No grounds for arrest under PMLA were made out against petitioner for money laundering offence. Petitioner not being involved in any illegal activity attracting PMLA offence, petition was allowed for his release if not required in any other case.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
