Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Proceeds of crime and legality of petitioner's arrest under PMLA for alleged illegal mining were examined. Grounds of arrest and reasons to believe were based solely on purported illegal mining by fabricating e-rawana bills. In first eight FIRs, petitioner was not an accused. In ninth FIR too, petitioner was not named, but ED tried implicating him as Director of DSPL, which records showed he ceased being from 07.11.2013. ED failed to substantiate petitioner's involvement as Director, Promoter or shareholder of the alleged GM Co. No material showed petitioner directly or indirectly indulged in any process connected with proceeds of crime or projected untainted proceeds. No grounds for arrest under PMLA were made out against petitioner for money laundering offence. Petitioner not being involved in any illegal activity attracting PMLA offence, petition was allowed for his release if not required in any other case.
Proceeds of crime and legality of petitioner's arrest under PMLA for alleged illegal mining were examined. Grounds of arrest and reasons to believe were based solely on purported illegal mining by fabricating e-rawana bills. In first eight FIRs, petitioner was not an accused. In ninth FIR too, petitioner was not named, but ED tried implicating him as Director of DSPL, which records showed he ceased being from 07.11.2013. ED failed to substantiate petitioner's involvement as Director, Promoter or shareholder of the alleged GM Co. No material showed petitioner directly or indirectly indulged in any process connected with proceeds of crime or projected untainted proceeds. No grounds for arrest under PMLA were made out against petitioner for money laundering offence. Petitioner not being involved in any illegal activity attracting PMLA offence, petition was allowed for his release if not required in any other case.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
