Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The summary focuses on the irregular availment of the Composition scheme and various demands raised by the adjudicating authority, along with the CESTAT's findings. It covers short payment of tax due to discharge at an incorrect rate, improper application of accrual/realization basis, discrepancies in GL codes and returns, non-maintenance of separate records for dutiable and exempt services, and irregular reversal of Cenvat credit for bad debts written off. The CESTAT examined each issue, relying on relevant legal provisions and judicial precedents. It set aside several demands, upheld a minor demand, and held that extended period invocation and penalties were not warranted due to lack of suppression of facts with intent to evade tax. The appellant's compliance with record-keeping requirements and regular filing of returns were also considered.
The summary focuses on the irregular availment of the Composition scheme and various demands raised by the adjudicating authority, along with the CESTAT's findings. It covers short payment of tax due to discharge at an incorrect rate, improper application of accrual/realization basis, discrepancies in GL codes and returns, non-maintenance of separate records for dutiable and exempt services, and irregular reversal of Cenvat credit for bad debts written off. The CESTAT examined each issue, relying on relevant legal provisions and judicial precedents. It set aside several demands, upheld a minor demand, and held that extended period invocation and penalties were not warranted due to lack of suppression of facts with intent to evade tax. The appellant's compliance with record-keeping requirements and regular filing of returns were also considered.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
