Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Corrugated board cleared independently without corrugated boxes is classified under Tariff Item 48191090, making it eligible for exemption under Notification No.04/2006-CE, Entry No.96E. Even if classified under 48191090, the goods are covered under the exemption notification. Alternatively, if the corrugated sheet is cleared without boxes, it is appropriately classifiable under 48081000, with the same rate of duty and exemption applicability as 48191010 during the relevant period. The adjudicating authority correctly classified the goods under 48081000 and dropped the demand raised in the show cause notice. The CESTAT upheld the impugned order, dismissing the Revenue's appeal.
Corrugated board cleared independently without corrugated boxes is classified under Tariff Item 48191090, making it eligible for exemption under Notification No.04/2006-CE, Entry No.96E. Even if classified under 48191090, the goods are covered under the exemption notification. Alternatively, if the corrugated sheet is cleared without boxes, it is appropriately classifiable under 48081000, with the same rate of duty and exemption applicability as 48191010 during the relevant period. The adjudicating authority correctly classified the goods under 48081000 and dropped the demand raised in the show cause notice. The CESTAT upheld the impugned order, dismissing the Revenue's appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.