Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
The auction sale notice for the immovable property of the society under liquidation was published with a lower valuation and upset price. Despite being aware of the undervaluation, the appellant did not promptly challenge it, allowing the auction to proceed. The auction purchaser was a statutory body, the Agricultural Produce Market Committee. The court held that the appellant's delayed objection after the auction was unjustified, as it should have approached the court promptly upon noticing the undervaluation. The law discourages indolent litigants and aims to protect accrued third-party rights. Although the purchaser's statutory status does not grant immunity for acquiring property at a throwaway price, the appellant's own interests as a cooperative bank deserve consideration. Invoking Article 142, the court directed the purchaser to pay the appellant Rs. 1,05,98,710 towards full settlement of the society's outstanding dues, disposing of the appeal.
The auction sale notice for the immovable property of the society under liquidation was published with a lower valuation and upset price. Despite being aware of the undervaluation, the appellant did not promptly challenge it, allowing the auction to proceed. The auction purchaser was a statutory body, the Agricultural Produce Market Committee. The court held that the appellant's delayed objection after the auction was unjustified, as it should have approached the court promptly upon noticing the undervaluation. The law discourages indolent litigants and aims to protect accrued third-party rights. Although the purchaser's statutory status does not grant immunity for acquiring property at a throwaway price, the appellant's own interests as a cooperative bank deserve consideration. Invoking Article 142, the court directed the purchaser to pay the appellant Rs. 1,05,98,710 towards full settlement of the society's outstanding dues, disposing of the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
