Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
The auction sale notice for the immovable property of the society under liquidation was published with a lower valuation and upset price. Despite being aware of the undervaluation, the appellant did not promptly challenge it, allowing the auction to proceed. The auction purchaser was a statutory body, the Agricultural Produce Market Committee. The court held that the appellant's delayed objection after the auction was unjustified, as it should have approached the court promptly upon noticing the undervaluation. The law discourages indolent litigants and aims to protect accrued third-party rights. Although the purchaser's statutory status does not grant immunity for acquiring property at a throwaway price, the appellant's own interests as a cooperative bank deserve consideration. Invoking Article 142, the court directed the purchaser to pay the appellant Rs. 1,05,98,710 towards full settlement of the society's outstanding dues, disposing of the appeal.
The auction sale notice for the immovable property of the society under liquidation was published with a lower valuation and upset price. Despite being aware of the undervaluation, the appellant did not promptly challenge it, allowing the auction to proceed. The auction purchaser was a statutory body, the Agricultural Produce Market Committee. The court held that the appellant's delayed objection after the auction was unjustified, as it should have approached the court promptly upon noticing the undervaluation. The law discourages indolent litigants and aims to protect accrued third-party rights. Although the purchaser's statutory status does not grant immunity for acquiring property at a throwaway price, the appellant's own interests as a cooperative bank deserve consideration. Invoking Article 142, the court directed the purchaser to pay the appellant Rs. 1,05,98,710 towards full settlement of the society's outstanding dues, disposing of the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
