Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Page of 4813
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3301 to 3320 of 96257 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Bail granted - creation of fake firms, availing and utilizing ITC - offences u/ss 132(1)(b), 132(1)(c), and 132(5) of CGST Act, 2017 - allegations based on witness statements, no documentary evidence adduced - petitioner languishing in jail since 25.06.2024 - trial unlikely to conclude soon - no apprehension of tampering evidence or flight risk - bail granted on furnishing bail bond of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of like amount and conditions.
Bail granted - creation of fake firms, availing and utilizing ITC - offences u/ss 132(1)(b), 132(1)(c), and 132(5) of CGST Act, 2017 - allegations based on witness statements, no documentary evidence adduced - petitioner languishing in jail since 25.06.2024 - trial unlikely to conclude soon - no apprehension of tampering evidence or flight risk - bail granted on furnishing bail bond of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of like amount and conditions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.