Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Page of 4813
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3301 to 3320 of 96257 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Assessee maintained separate books of accounts and furnished audited financial statements for each eligible infrastructure project, fulfilling conditions for deduction u/s 80IA. CIT(A) rightly allowed deduction, following precedent. Unverified credit balances cannot be added as payments were made through cheques and reflected in books. Ad hoc disallowances of expenses and wages deleted by CIT(A) based on Tribunal decisions. TDS u/s 194H not deducted on petty commission payments below Rs. 5,000, rightly deleted by CIT(A). Assessee opted for Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, paid identified tax, eligible for refund. Cross-objection withdrawn with liberty to restore if dispute not settled under scheme. No interference warranted in CIT(A)'s well-reasoned order.
Assessee maintained separate books of accounts and furnished audited financial statements for each eligible infrastructure project, fulfilling conditions for deduction u/s 80IA. CIT(A) rightly allowed deduction, following precedent. Unverified credit balances cannot be added as payments were made through cheques and reflected in books. Ad hoc disallowances of expenses and wages deleted by CIT(A) based on Tribunal decisions. TDS u/s 194H not deducted on petty commission payments below Rs. 5,000, rightly deleted by CIT(A). Assessee opted for Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, paid identified tax, eligible for refund. Cross-objection withdrawn with liberty to restore if dispute not settled under scheme. No interference warranted in CIT(A)'s well-reasoned order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4813 
Join Channel 
