Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Assessee maintained separate books of accounts and furnished audited financial statements for each eligible infrastructure project, fulfilling conditions for deduction u/s 80IA. CIT(A) rightly allowed deduction, following precedent. Unverified credit balances cannot be added as payments were made through cheques and reflected in books. Ad hoc disallowances of expenses and wages deleted by CIT(A) based on Tribunal decisions. TDS u/s 194H not deducted on petty commission payments below Rs. 5,000, rightly deleted by CIT(A). Assessee opted for Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, paid identified tax, eligible for refund. Cross-objection withdrawn with liberty to restore if dispute not settled under scheme. No interference warranted in CIT(A)'s well-reasoned order.
Assessee maintained separate books of accounts and furnished audited financial statements for each eligible infrastructure project, fulfilling conditions for deduction u/s 80IA. CIT(A) rightly allowed deduction, following precedent. Unverified credit balances cannot be added as payments were made through cheques and reflected in books. Ad hoc disallowances of expenses and wages deleted by CIT(A) based on Tribunal decisions. TDS u/s 194H not deducted on petty commission payments below Rs. 5,000, rightly deleted by CIT(A). Assessee opted for Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, paid identified tax, eligible for refund. Cross-objection withdrawn with liberty to restore if dispute not settled under scheme. No interference warranted in CIT(A)'s well-reasoned order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.