Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process initiated. Applicant alleged transactions worth Rs. 3.87 crores as preferential or fraudulent, seeking recovery from respondents. Tribunal unable to classify Rs. 3.87 crore transactions due to lack of information. One vehicle transferred post-CIRP initiation treated as fraudulent transaction. u/s 66(2)(b) IBC, respondents directed to contribute Rs. 13,74,585 to Corporate Debtor's assets for failure to exercise due diligence in minimizing potential loss to creditors. Application partly allowed.
Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process initiated. Applicant alleged transactions worth Rs. 3.87 crores as preferential or fraudulent, seeking recovery from respondents. Tribunal unable to classify Rs. 3.87 crore transactions due to lack of information. One vehicle transferred post-CIRP initiation treated as fraudulent transaction. u/s 66(2)(b) IBC, respondents directed to contribute Rs. 13,74,585 to Corporate Debtor's assets for failure to exercise due diligence in minimizing potential loss to creditors. Application partly allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
