Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process initiated. Applicant alleged transactions worth Rs. 3.87 crores as preferential or fraudulent, seeking recovery from respondents. Tribunal unable to classify Rs. 3.87 crore transactions due to lack of information. One vehicle transferred post-CIRP initiation treated as fraudulent transaction. u/s 66(2)(b) IBC, respondents directed to contribute Rs. 13,74,585 to Corporate Debtor's assets for failure to exercise due diligence in minimizing potential loss to creditors. Application partly allowed.
Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process initiated. Applicant alleged transactions worth Rs. 3.87 crores as preferential or fraudulent, seeking recovery from respondents. Tribunal unable to classify Rs. 3.87 crore transactions due to lack of information. One vehicle transferred post-CIRP initiation treated as fraudulent transaction. u/s 66(2)(b) IBC, respondents directed to contribute Rs. 13,74,585 to Corporate Debtor's assets for failure to exercise due diligence in minimizing potential loss to creditors. Application partly allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
