Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
981 to 1000 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Appellant paid service tax on entire value of cleaning services, but for remaining services paid tax only on margin money after deducting expenses. Commissioner disallowed expenses, stating appellant did not produce evidence of not receiving amount over shown receipts. Appellant incurred expenses for services other than cleaning, not as pure agent. Gross amount received is taxable value as per Section 67, not permissible to deduct expenses. No suppression with intent to evade tax established in show cause notice or orders to invoke extended period of limitation. Late payment fees upheld for delay in filing ST-3 return, being legal obligation unrelated to tax evasion. Demand of service tax, interest and penalties set aside on limitation grounds, but penalty for late return filing upheld.
Appellant paid service tax on entire value of cleaning services, but for remaining services paid tax only on margin money after deducting expenses. Commissioner disallowed expenses, stating appellant did not produce evidence of not receiving amount over shown receipts. Appellant incurred expenses for services other than cleaning, not as pure agent. Gross amount received is taxable value as per Section 67, not permissible to deduct expenses. No suppression with intent to evade tax established in show cause notice or orders to invoke extended period of limitation. Late payment fees upheld for delay in filing ST-3 return, being legal obligation unrelated to tax evasion. Demand of service tax, interest and penalties set aside on limitation grounds, but penalty for late return filing upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.