Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
701 to 720 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Appellant paid service tax on entire value of cleaning services, but for remaining services paid tax only on margin money after deducting expenses. Commissioner disallowed expenses, stating appellant did not produce evidence of not receiving amount over shown receipts. Appellant incurred expenses for services other than cleaning, not as pure agent. Gross amount received is taxable value as per Section 67, not permissible to deduct expenses. No suppression with intent to evade tax established in show cause notice or orders to invoke extended period of limitation. Late payment fees upheld for delay in filing ST-3 return, being legal obligation unrelated to tax evasion. Demand of service tax, interest and penalties set aside on limitation grounds, but penalty for late return filing upheld.
Appellant paid service tax on entire value of cleaning services, but for remaining services paid tax only on margin money after deducting expenses. Commissioner disallowed expenses, stating appellant did not produce evidence of not receiving amount over shown receipts. Appellant incurred expenses for services other than cleaning, not as pure agent. Gross amount received is taxable value as per Section 67, not permissible to deduct expenses. No suppression with intent to evade tax established in show cause notice or orders to invoke extended period of limitation. Late payment fees upheld for delay in filing ST-3 return, being legal obligation unrelated to tax evasion. Demand of service tax, interest and penalties set aside on limitation grounds, but penalty for late return filing upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.