Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
GST levy on supply of free power questioned - whether free power supplied as compensation to States for distress caused by hydro power projects can be considered "consideration" for services rendered by States to attract GST. Held: Petitioner's contentions have force that free electricity may not constitute "consideration" but "compensation", raising doubt on leviability of GST. Respondents cannot treat free electricity as consideration for alleged services by State as supplier. Interim stay granted on further proceedings pursuant to Annexure P-1 dated 14.06.2024 considering petitioner is government company and huge liability imposed despite contrary view by Central Excise Department. Matter listed on 18.11.2024.
GST levy on supply of free power questioned - whether free power supplied as compensation to States for distress caused by hydro power projects can be considered "consideration" for services rendered by States to attract GST. Held: Petitioner's contentions have force that free electricity may not constitute "consideration" but "compensation", raising doubt on leviability of GST. Respondents cannot treat free electricity as consideration for alleged services by State as supplier. Interim stay granted on further proceedings pursuant to Annexure P-1 dated 14.06.2024 considering petitioner is government company and huge liability imposed despite contrary view by Central Excise Department. Matter listed on 18.11.2024.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.