Pre-existing operational debt disputes require genuine evidence, while undirected running-account payments may be appropriated on a first-in-first-out...
Agency in CNG distribution makes outlet operators commission agents, rendering taxable Business Auxiliary Service rather than purchasing goods for res...
Composite inpatient healthcare supply may retain exemption despite MRP medicine billing, while separate taxable sale characterisation remains disputed...
Working-capital adjustment determines whether software-services transfer-pricing margins fall within the statutory tolerance range, eliminating any ad...
Permanent establishment deductions upheld for expatriate salaries, direct costs and trading losses, while head-office costs require fresh classificati...
Page of 4796
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
881 to 900 of 95916 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Determining the maintainability of a Section 7 application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) based on the date of default and the applicability of limitation periods. The key points are: The correct date of default was 26.02.2001 as per the recall notice, not 01.06.2019 mentioned in the application. The limitation period under Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963, applies to Section 7 applications. The benefit of excluding the limitation period u/s 22(5) of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act (SICA), 1985, was wrongly denied by the adjudicating authority. However, even after excluding the relevant periods, the Section 7 application filed on 19.12.2019 was beyond the limitation period. The acknowledgment in the 2015-16 balance sheet was after the expiry of the limitation period. Consequently, the adjudicating authority rightly rejected the Section 7 application as time-barred, and the appeal was dismissed.
Determining the maintainability of a Section 7 application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) based on the date of default and the applicability of limitation periods. The key points are: The correct date of default was 26.02.2001 as per the recall notice, not 01.06.2019 mentioned in the application. The limitation period under Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963, applies to Section 7 applications. The benefit of excluding the limitation period u/s 22(5) of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act (SICA), 1985, was wrongly denied by the adjudicating authority. However, even after excluding the relevant periods, the Section 7 application filed on 19.12.2019 was beyond the limitation period. The acknowledgment in the 2015-16 balance sheet was after the expiry of the limitation period. Consequently, the adjudicating authority rightly rejected the Section 7 application as time-barred, and the appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
