Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Manufacturer cleared excisable goods to Mega Power Projects and SEZ units. Refund claim filed for accumulated CENVAT credit u/r 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Refund permissible as per CBEC Circular 1001/8/2015-CE dated 28.04.2015. CESTAT in CCE, Faridabad vs. M/s Delton Cables Ltd. held refund rightly allowed for clearances to 100% EOU mega projects. Appellant entitled to refund of accumulated CENVAT credit for clearances to Mega Power Projects and SEZ units u/r 5. Impugned order sanctioning refund restored, appeal allowed.
Manufacturer cleared excisable goods to Mega Power Projects and SEZ units. Refund claim filed for accumulated CENVAT credit u/r 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Refund permissible as per CBEC Circular 1001/8/2015-CE dated 28.04.2015. CESTAT in CCE, Faridabad vs. M/s Delton Cables Ltd. held refund rightly allowed for clearances to 100% EOU mega projects. Appellant entitled to refund of accumulated CENVAT credit for clearances to Mega Power Projects and SEZ units u/r 5. Impugned order sanctioning refund restored, appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.