Condonation of refiling delay refused where repeated defects, lack of diligence and vague explanations defeated the appeal against resolution plan app...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4401 to 4420 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Manufacturer cleared excisable goods to Mega Power Projects and SEZ units. Refund claim filed for accumulated CENVAT credit u/r 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Refund permissible as per CBEC Circular 1001/8/2015-CE dated 28.04.2015. CESTAT in CCE, Faridabad vs. M/s Delton Cables Ltd. held refund rightly allowed for clearances to 100% EOU mega projects. Appellant entitled to refund of accumulated CENVAT credit for clearances to Mega Power Projects and SEZ units u/r 5. Impugned order sanctioning refund restored, appeal allowed.
Manufacturer cleared excisable goods to Mega Power Projects and SEZ units. Refund claim filed for accumulated CENVAT credit u/r 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Refund permissible as per CBEC Circular 1001/8/2015-CE dated 28.04.2015. CESTAT in CCE, Faridabad vs. M/s Delton Cables Ltd. held refund rightly allowed for clearances to 100% EOU mega projects. Appellant entitled to refund of accumulated CENVAT credit for clearances to Mega Power Projects and SEZ units u/r 5. Impugned order sanctioning refund restored, appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
