Composite inpatient healthcare supply may retain exemption despite MRP medicine billing, while separate taxable sale characterisation remains disputed...
Working-capital adjustment determines whether software-services transfer-pricing margins fall within the statutory tolerance range, eliminating any ad...
Permanent establishment deductions upheld for expatriate salaries, direct costs and trading losses, while head-office costs require fresh classificati...
Bail application dismissed in a case involving serious offences u/ss 420, 467, 471 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, related to the use of fake, forged, and fictitious documents to obtain holding numbers. The court held that while bail is generally the rule and jail the exception, socio-economic offences with deep-rooted conspiracies affecting societal moral fibre require a different approach. The accused's prolonged incarceration was deemed inconsequential given the gravity of the offence. The investigating agency's ongoing expedited trial process was also considered. Bail was granted to a purchaser protected u/s 54 of the Transfer of Property Act on different grounds. The court emphasized the need for a judicious exercise of discretion in granting or refusing bail based on the facts and circumstances of each case.
Bail application dismissed in a case involving serious offences u/ss 420, 467, 471 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, related to the use of fake, forged, and fictitious documents to obtain holding numbers. The court held that while bail is generally the rule and jail the exception, socio-economic offences with deep-rooted conspiracies affecting societal moral fibre require a different approach. The accused's prolonged incarceration was deemed inconsequential given the gravity of the offence. The investigating agency's ongoing expedited trial process was also considered. Bail was granted to a purchaser protected u/s 54 of the Transfer of Property Act on different grounds. The court emphasized the need for a judicious exercise of discretion in granting or refusing bail based on the facts and circumstances of each case.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
