Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Penalty proceedings u/s 271B for failure to get accounts audited. The assessee's main income was commission earned from sales of milk, acting as an agent for the mother dairy. The gross sales reported were not the actual sales but those of the mother dairy. As a small-time agent, the assessee purchased milk in bulk and sold it daily, remitting the amount to the mother dairy and retaining the commission income. The Assessing Officer observed that the assessee did not maintain books of account. Considering the nature of the assessee's activities, it was not possible to maintain books, and the requirement for audit depended on the gross commission income, not sales. Therefore, the Appellate Tribunal decided in favor of the assessee and held that there was no reason to levy penalty u/s 271B.
Penalty proceedings u/s 271B for failure to get accounts audited. The assessee's main income was commission earned from sales of milk, acting as an agent for the mother dairy. The gross sales reported were not the actual sales but those of the mother dairy. As a small-time agent, the assessee purchased milk in bulk and sold it daily, remitting the amount to the mother dairy and retaining the commission income. The Assessing Officer observed that the assessee did not maintain books of account. Considering the nature of the assessee's activities, it was not possible to maintain books, and the requirement for audit depended on the gross commission income, not sales. Therefore, the Appellate Tribunal decided in favor of the assessee and held that there was no reason to levy penalty u/s 271B.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.