Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The petitioner had availed Input Tax Credit (ITC) from certain suppliers whose registration was subsequently cancelled. The petitioner contended that at the relevant time, the suppliers were registered under GST laws, and the petitioner had paid the invoiced amount including GST, entitling it to claim ITC. However, the adjudicating authority did not examine this contention. The High Court set aside the impugned order and granted the petitioner an opportunity to file supporting documents substantiating its claim to avail ITC within two weeks, remanding the matter for fresh consideration.
The petitioner had availed Input Tax Credit (ITC) from certain suppliers whose registration was subsequently cancelled. The petitioner contended that at the relevant time, the suppliers were registered under GST laws, and the petitioner had paid the invoiced amount including GST, entitling it to claim ITC. However, the adjudicating authority did not examine this contention. The High Court set aside the impugned order and granted the petitioner an opportunity to file supporting documents substantiating its claim to avail ITC within two weeks, remanding the matter for fresh consideration.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
