Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Section 56(2)(x) deals with the addition of the difference between the fair market value of a property and the consideration paid, to the income of the recipient. The key points are: When the consideration is fixed on the agreement date, and registration occurs later, the stamp duty value on the agreement date is relevant if payment is made through banking channels by that date. The allotment letter from the builder, containing agreed terms and payment schedule, qualifies as an agreement under this provision. If the payment made by the agreed date exceeds the stamp duty value on that date, no addition u/s 56(2)(x) can be made. The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal on these grounds.
Section 56(2)(x) deals with the addition of the difference between the fair market value of a property and the consideration paid, to the income of the recipient. The key points are: When the consideration is fixed on the agreement date, and registration occurs later, the stamp duty value on the agreement date is relevant if payment is made through banking channels by that date. The allotment letter from the builder, containing agreed terms and payment schedule, qualifies as an agreement under this provision. If the payment made by the agreed date exceeds the stamp duty value on that date, no addition u/s 56(2)(x) can be made. The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal on these grounds.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
