Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal, holding that the Adjudicating Authority rightly refused to grant reliefs and concessions to the Appellant regarding extinguishment of claims and liabilities up to the date of e-auction sale of the Corporate Debtor as a 'going concern'. The reliefs and concessions granted were limited to the period prior to the date of CIRP commencement. Claims, known or unknown, disclosed or undisclosed, are to be dealt with as per Section 53 of the IBC up to the cut-off date, i.e., the date of commencement of liquidation, as per the e-auction Notice. Regulations 12 and 16 contemplate filing of claims as on the liquidation commencement date, and there can be no extinguishment of claims up to the date of e-auction sale. The prayer for granting reliefs and concessions up to the e-auction date is not in accord with the statutory scheme of the IBBI (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016.
The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal, holding that the Adjudicating Authority rightly refused to grant reliefs and concessions to the Appellant regarding extinguishment of claims and liabilities up to the date of e-auction sale of the Corporate Debtor as a 'going concern'. The reliefs and concessions granted were limited to the period prior to the date of CIRP commencement. Claims, known or unknown, disclosed or undisclosed, are to be dealt with as per Section 53 of the IBC up to the cut-off date, i.e., the date of commencement of liquidation, as per the e-auction Notice. Regulations 12 and 16 contemplate filing of claims as on the liquidation commencement date, and there can be no extinguishment of claims up to the date of e-auction sale. The prayer for granting reliefs and concessions up to the e-auction date is not in accord with the statutory scheme of the IBBI (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.