Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The appeal was dismissed by the NCLAT as the Adjudicating Authority correctly dismissed the Section 9 application due to the existence of a pre-existing dispute between the parties regarding the quality of goods supplied by the Operational Creditor, prior to the issuance of the demand notice. The Respondent had filed a civil suit before the demand notice and contested the defective goods supplied, establishing a real, substantial, and bona fide dispute as per the Supreme Court's ruling in Mobilox Innovations Pvt. Ltd. v. Kirusa Software Pvt. Ltd. The Appellant's claim for outstanding payments was also refuted by the Respondent's bank statements and ledgers, indicating no outstanding dues. The impugned order was upheld, and the appeal was dismissed.
The appeal was dismissed by the NCLAT as the Adjudicating Authority correctly dismissed the Section 9 application due to the existence of a pre-existing dispute between the parties regarding the quality of goods supplied by the Operational Creditor, prior to the issuance of the demand notice. The Respondent had filed a civil suit before the demand notice and contested the defective goods supplied, establishing a real, substantial, and bona fide dispute as per the Supreme Court's ruling in Mobilox Innovations Pvt. Ltd. v. Kirusa Software Pvt. Ltd. The Appellant's claim for outstanding payments was also refuted by the Respondent's bank statements and ledgers, indicating no outstanding dues. The impugned order was upheld, and the appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
