Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
This case pertains to the refund of penal amounts or taxes paid for goods seized due to lack of proper documentation during transit. The court held that the movement of goods accompanied by e-way bills, tax invoices, or delivery challans from the originating state shall be treated as bona fide and not attract any penalty or tax under the GST regime. The court agreed with the precedent set by the Andhra Pradesh High Court in Kaveri Enterprises v. State of Andhra Pradesh, which had considered similar contentions. The petition was disposed of, subject to the fulfillment of specified conditions.
This case pertains to the refund of penal amounts or taxes paid for goods seized due to lack of proper documentation during transit. The court held that the movement of goods accompanied by e-way bills, tax invoices, or delivery challans from the originating state shall be treated as bona fide and not attract any penalty or tax under the GST regime. The court agreed with the precedent set by the Andhra Pradesh High Court in Kaveri Enterprises v. State of Andhra Pradesh, which had considered similar contentions. The petition was disposed of, subject to the fulfillment of specified conditions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
