Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The High Court held that the intimation u/s 143(1) of the Income Tax Act falls within the ambit of 'any orders' envisaged u/s 264, making revision maintainable against such intimation. Section 264 confers wide powers to correct errors committed by subordinate authorities or even errors by the assessee in not claiming legitimate deductions. The Commissioner has the power to condone delays to do substantial justice by disposing matters on merits. Relying on precedent, the Court ruled that revision u/s 264 is maintainable against intimations u/s 143(1).
The High Court held that the intimation u/s 143(1) of the Income Tax Act falls within the ambit of 'any orders' envisaged u/s 264, making revision maintainable against such intimation. Section 264 confers wide powers to correct errors committed by subordinate authorities or even errors by the assessee in not claiming legitimate deductions. The Commissioner has the power to condone delays to do substantial justice by disposing matters on merits. Relying on precedent, the Court ruled that revision u/s 264 is maintainable against intimations u/s 143(1).
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
