Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The High Court allowed the petition, quashing and setting aside the impugned order rejecting the application for condonation of delay in filing Form 10B under the Income Tax Act, 1961. The delay of 361 days occurred in filing Form 10B electronically. The Central Board of Direct Taxes directed authorities to condone the delay in cases where the audit report was obtained before filing the return of income. The authority erroneously interpreted that Form 10B should have been filed by 31st March, 2018, instead of considering the requirement of obtaining Form 10B before filing the return of income as per Circular No.10. The High Court held that the authority's interpretation was ex facie faulty and contrary to the plain language of the Circular, necessitating the quashing of the impugned order.
The High Court allowed the petition, quashing and setting aside the impugned order rejecting the application for condonation of delay in filing Form 10B under the Income Tax Act, 1961. The delay of 361 days occurred in filing Form 10B electronically. The Central Board of Direct Taxes directed authorities to condone the delay in cases where the audit report was obtained before filing the return of income. The authority erroneously interpreted that Form 10B should have been filed by 31st March, 2018, instead of considering the requirement of obtaining Form 10B before filing the return of income as per Circular No.10. The High Court held that the authority's interpretation was ex facie faulty and contrary to the plain language of the Circular, necessitating the quashing of the impugned order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
