Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The issue pertains to the validity of reopening the assessment u/s 147, where an addition was made based on an excel sheet found in a search on an employee of the Maverick Group. The assessee had filed objections against the reasons recorded, which were rejected by the Assessing Officer (AO) in a summary manner. The assessment was completed u/s 143(3) read with Section 147 by adding the said sum, alleging that the assessee had paid interest in cash out of an undisclosed source of income. Initially, a notice u/s 133(6) was issued, alleging that the amount appearing as 'adjustment interest' was interest received, and the assessee was asked to disclose the same in the return of income. However, the assessee explained that the interest was paid by them, not received, and confirmations were submitted during proceedings u/s 153A. The AO changed the stance, alleging that the 'Adjustment' column amount was interest paid by the assessee out of undisclosed sources and not recorded in the books. During the Maverick group's assessment, it was observed that the excel sheet was received from a finance broker working for multiple parties, and the broker was asking for additional interest not given. Relying on the ITAT Jaipur decision in M/s. Maverick Share Brokers Private Limited, it was found that.
The issue pertains to the validity of reopening the assessment u/s 147, where an addition was made based on an excel sheet found in a search on an employee of the Maverick Group. The assessee had filed objections against the reasons recorded, which were rejected by the Assessing Officer (AO) in a summary manner. The assessment was completed u/s 143(3) read with Section 147 by adding the said sum, alleging that the assessee had paid interest in cash out of an undisclosed source of income. Initially, a notice u/s 133(6) was issued, alleging that the amount appearing as 'adjustment interest' was interest received, and the assessee was asked to disclose the same in the return of income. However, the assessee explained that the interest was paid by them, not received, and confirmations were submitted during proceedings u/s 153A. The AO changed the stance, alleging that the 'Adjustment' column amount was interest paid by the assessee out of undisclosed sources and not recorded in the books. During the Maverick group's assessment, it was observed that the excel sheet was received from a finance broker working for multiple parties, and the broker was asking for additional interest not given. Relying on the ITAT Jaipur decision in M/s. Maverick Share Brokers Private Limited, it was found that.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.