Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The court granted regular bail to the applicant charged u/s 120B of the IPC and Sections 7/7A/8 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The applicant has been cooperative during the investigation, and the investigations against them are complete. Despite the voluminous documents and witnesses involved, the applicant has been in custody since 29.11.2022, while co-accused in similar circumstances have been granted bail. Citing the Supreme Court's observations in Manish Sisodia v. Directorate of Enforcement, the court emphasized that prolonged incarceration before conviction should not become punishment, and the fundamental right to liberty under Article 21 is superior to statutory restrictions. The applicant has deep roots in society, and there is no risk of fleeing. Conditions can be imposed to ensure attendance during trial. Consequently, the court directed the applicant's release on bail subject to fulfilling the imposed conditions.
The court granted regular bail to the applicant charged u/s 120B of the IPC and Sections 7/7A/8 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The applicant has been cooperative during the investigation, and the investigations against them are complete. Despite the voluminous documents and witnesses involved, the applicant has been in custody since 29.11.2022, while co-accused in similar circumstances have been granted bail. Citing the Supreme Court's observations in Manish Sisodia v. Directorate of Enforcement, the court emphasized that prolonged incarceration before conviction should not become punishment, and the fundamental right to liberty under Article 21 is superior to statutory restrictions. The applicant has deep roots in society, and there is no risk of fleeing. Conditions can be imposed to ensure attendance during trial. Consequently, the court directed the applicant's release on bail subject to fulfilling the imposed conditions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
