Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
This circular clarifies the regularization of refund of IGST availed in contravention of rule 96(10) of Assam GST Rules, 2017, where exporters had imported inputs without paying integrated taxes and compensation cess. Initially, if inputs were imported without IGST and cess by availing exemption notifications, but later the exporter paid these taxes with interest and got the Bill of Entry reassessed, then the IGST paid on exports shall not be considered in contravention of rule 96(10). The explanation inserted in rule 96(10) retrospectively clarifies that exemption benefit is not considered availed if IGST and cess are paid on inputs. Hence, refund of IGST on exports can be regularized in such cases where taxes were subsequently paid on imported inputs.
This circular clarifies the regularization of refund of IGST availed in contravention of rule 96(10) of Assam GST Rules, 2017, where exporters had imported inputs without paying integrated taxes and compensation cess. Initially, if inputs were imported without IGST and cess by availing exemption notifications, but later the exporter paid these taxes with interest and got the Bill of Entry reassessed, then the IGST paid on exports shall not be considered in contravention of rule 96(10). The explanation inserted in rule 96(10) retrospectively clarifies that exemption benefit is not considered availed if IGST and cess are paid on inputs. Hence, refund of IGST on exports can be regularized in such cases where taxes were subsequently paid on imported inputs.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
