Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
This circular clarifies the regularization of refund of IGST availed in contravention of rule 96(10) of Assam GST Rules, 2017, where exporters had imported inputs without paying integrated taxes and compensation cess. Initially, if inputs were imported without IGST and cess by availing exemption notifications, but later the exporter paid these taxes with interest and got the Bill of Entry reassessed, then the IGST paid on exports shall not be considered in contravention of rule 96(10). The explanation inserted in rule 96(10) retrospectively clarifies that exemption benefit is not considered availed if IGST and cess are paid on inputs. Hence, refund of IGST on exports can be regularized in such cases where taxes were subsequently paid on imported inputs.
This circular clarifies the regularization of refund of IGST availed in contravention of rule 96(10) of Assam GST Rules, 2017, where exporters had imported inputs without paying integrated taxes and compensation cess. Initially, if inputs were imported without IGST and cess by availing exemption notifications, but later the exporter paid these taxes with interest and got the Bill of Entry reassessed, then the IGST paid on exports shall not be considered in contravention of rule 96(10). The explanation inserted in rule 96(10) retrospectively clarifies that exemption benefit is not considered availed if IGST and cess are paid on inputs. Hence, refund of IGST on exports can be regularized in such cases where taxes were subsequently paid on imported inputs.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
