Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
The petitioner, a US citizen and Overseas Citizen of India (OCI) cardholder, violated FEMA regulations by purchasing vast agricultural properties in India without RBI permission. Compounding proceedings were initiated, and a penalty was computed as per the Master Directions. The petitioner argued that the penalty was exorbitant despite complying with RBI's directions to sell the properties to an Indian citizen. However, the court held that the computation method followed the prescribed regulations. Considering the cash component of the sale contravening FEMA, the petitioner was dealt with fairly by imposing a fine not exceeding 300% of the contravention amount. The opportunity for a hearing was provided but not availed. The court dismissed the writ petition, finding no legally sustainable grounds to fault the respondent's decision.
The petitioner, a US citizen and Overseas Citizen of India (OCI) cardholder, violated FEMA regulations by purchasing vast agricultural properties in India without RBI permission. Compounding proceedings were initiated, and a penalty was computed as per the Master Directions. The petitioner argued that the penalty was exorbitant despite complying with RBI's directions to sell the properties to an Indian citizen. However, the court held that the computation method followed the prescribed regulations. Considering the cash component of the sale contravening FEMA, the petitioner was dealt with fairly by imposing a fine not exceeding 300% of the contravention amount. The opportunity for a hearing was provided but not availed. The court dismissed the writ petition, finding no legally sustainable grounds to fault the respondent's decision.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.