Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The assessment u/s 143(3) was completed, disallowing the deduction u/s 10B on grounds that processing iron ore does not constitute manufacturing within Section 10B's meaning and the Amona and Chitradurga units were not new units. The Tribunal allowed the Section 10B deduction claim. The High Court held that reopening assessment to disallow Section 10B deduction based on survey evidence cannot be permitted as it violates Section 147's third proviso. The assessee's claim for Section 10B deduction from export-oriented undertakings at Amona, Chitradurga, and Codli was adjudicated in original assessment proceedings. Reassessing to disallow the deduction again exceeds jurisdiction. The Court ruled in the assessee's favor.
The assessment u/s 143(3) was completed, disallowing the deduction u/s 10B on grounds that processing iron ore does not constitute manufacturing within Section 10B's meaning and the Amona and Chitradurga units were not new units. The Tribunal allowed the Section 10B deduction claim. The High Court held that reopening assessment to disallow Section 10B deduction based on survey evidence cannot be permitted as it violates Section 147's third proviso. The assessee's claim for Section 10B deduction from export-oriented undertakings at Amona, Chitradurga, and Codli was adjudicated in original assessment proceedings. Reassessing to disallow the deduction again exceeds jurisdiction. The Court ruled in the assessee's favor.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.