Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Contraventions of Sections 9(1)(b) & 9(1)(d) of the relevant law were established against the appellants, involving receiving and making payments to/from persons resident outside India without RBI exemption. The adjudicating authority considered retracted statements corroborated by independent evidence and provided adequate opportunity during adjudication proceedings. Cross-examination was not prejudicial after serving show cause notice and relied upon documents. The appellate tribunal upheld the contraventions but reduced the penalties to the amounts of pre-deposit made by the appellants, considering their economic status, at Rs. 13,50,000/- and Rs. 1,35,000/- respectively.
Contraventions of Sections 9(1)(b) & 9(1)(d) of the relevant law were established against the appellants, involving receiving and making payments to/from persons resident outside India without RBI exemption. The adjudicating authority considered retracted statements corroborated by independent evidence and provided adequate opportunity during adjudication proceedings. Cross-examination was not prejudicial after serving show cause notice and relied upon documents. The appellate tribunal upheld the contraventions but reduced the penalties to the amounts of pre-deposit made by the appellants, considering their economic status, at Rs. 13,50,000/- and Rs. 1,35,000/- respectively.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
