Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
Contraventions of Sections 9(1)(b) & 9(1)(d) of the relevant law were established against the appellants, involving receiving and making payments to/from persons resident outside India without RBI exemption. The adjudicating authority considered retracted statements corroborated by independent evidence and provided adequate opportunity during adjudication proceedings. Cross-examination was not prejudicial after serving show cause notice and relied upon documents. The appellate tribunal upheld the contraventions but reduced the penalties to the amounts of pre-deposit made by the appellants, considering their economic status, at Rs. 13,50,000/- and Rs. 1,35,000/- respectively.
Contraventions of Sections 9(1)(b) & 9(1)(d) of the relevant law were established against the appellants, involving receiving and making payments to/from persons resident outside India without RBI exemption. The adjudicating authority considered retracted statements corroborated by independent evidence and provided adequate opportunity during adjudication proceedings. Cross-examination was not prejudicial after serving show cause notice and relied upon documents. The appellate tribunal upheld the contraventions but reduced the penalties to the amounts of pre-deposit made by the appellants, considering their economic status, at Rs. 13,50,000/- and Rs. 1,35,000/- respectively.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.