Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
Page of 4830
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
181 to 200 of 96587 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Appellate Tribunal (AT) upheld the Adjudicating Authority's finding that the Appellant contravened Section 3(a) of FEMA for an amount of US$ 99,770, and Sections 3(a) & 3(d) for amounts US$ 5,95,738.4 and RMB 5,78,079.8. However, it set aside the contravention charge for US$ 16,000 based on the Appellant's statement. The AT ordered the release of the seized foreign currency and Indian currency of Rs. 9.29 Lakh, which was not confiscated. It reduced the consolidated penalty imposed on the Appellant for the contraventions to Rs. 15,00,000/- from the disproportionately higher amount, finding it reasonable. The AT directed the principles of natural justice were not violated as the Appellant's cross-examination request was not sustainable under FEMA provisions.
The Appellate Tribunal (AT) upheld the Adjudicating Authority's finding that the Appellant contravened Section 3(a) of FEMA for an amount of US$ 99,770, and Sections 3(a) & 3(d) for amounts US$ 5,95,738.4 and RMB 5,78,079.8. However, it set aside the contravention charge for US$ 16,000 based on the Appellant's statement. The AT ordered the release of the seized foreign currency and Indian currency of Rs. 9.29 Lakh, which was not confiscated. It reduced the consolidated penalty imposed on the Appellant for the contraventions to Rs. 15,00,000/- from the disproportionately higher amount, finding it reasonable. The AT directed the principles of natural justice were not violated as the Appellant's cross-examination request was not sustainable under FEMA provisions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4830 
Join Channel 
